Kilgore v. Mandeville et al

Filing 131

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/7/2013 GRANTING plaintiff's 129 motion to re-open discovery; the deadline for conducting any further discovery is now 4/1/2013; within 14 days, defendants' counsel shall provide p laintiff, in an organized fashion, with copies of all discovery to date (to the extent plaintiff has not already received it from his former counsel); the deadline for filing dispositive motions is extended to 6/28/2013; and plaintiff's 130 motion to compel the filing of defendants' deposition transcripts is DENIED without prejudice.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IVAN KILGORE, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:07-cv-2485 GEB KJN P vs. RICHARD MANDEVILLE, et al., Defendants. ORDER / On October 23, 2012, this court granted the motion of plaintiff’s appointed 17 counsel to withdraw, and directed plaintiff to proceed in this action pro se. (Dkt. No. 127.) 18 Thereafter, the parties submitted confidential statements regarding the advisability of setting a 19 settlement conference. After reviewing the parties’ statements, the court determined that a 20 settlement conference would not be helpful at this time. (Dkt. No. 128.) The court noted that 21 discovery expired in this case on July 27, 2012, and that the prior dispositive motion 22 deadline of September 29, 2012 was vacated pending the court’s consideration of counsel’s 23 motion to withdraw. The court set a new dispositive motion deadline of January 18, 2013. (Id.) 24 Plaintiff now moves to re-open discovery. Defendants have not filed an 25 opposition. Plaintiff’s lengthy motion and exhibits recount the same alleged deficiencies in 26 discovery recounted in plaintiff’s criticisms of appointed counsel. For this reason, the court will 1 1 re-open discovery to permit plaintiff adequate time to obtain all appropriate discovery to date, 2 and any other reasonable discovery he seeks. Plaintiff is cautioned that this extension of time is 3 not intended to position the court as the arbiter of any further discovery disputes in this action; 4 the court has already spent an inordinate amount of time resolving discovery matters in this case. 5 Rather, plaintiff may utilize this time to collect and organize all discovery to date, and to seek 6 limited discovery that is not duplicative of that already sought. The court directs defendants’ 7 counsel to provide plaintiff, in an organized fashion, with copies of all discovery to date (to the 8 extent plaintiff has not already received it from his former counsel). While plaintiff cannot again 9 depose defendants, he must seek to identify the alleged omissions in counsel’s questioning, and 10 rely on other evidence to support his claims. Both plaintiff and defendants’ counsel are 11 encouraged to proceed cooperatively and in good faith in providing any reasonably requested 12 discovery, and in resolving any disputes that may arise. 13 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 14 1. Plaintiff’s motion to re-open discovery (Dkt. No. 129), is granted. 15 2. The deadline for conducting any further discovery is now April 1, 2013. 16 3. Within fourteen (14) days after the filing date of this order, defendants’ 17 counsel shall provide plaintiff, in an organized fashion, with copies of all discovery to date (to 18 the extent plaintiff has not already received it from his former counsel). 19 4. The deadline for filing dispositive motions is extended to June 28, 2013. Any 20 dispositive motion shall expressly inform plaintiff of the requirements for opposing such motion, 21 as set forth by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 22 2012). 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 2 1 2 3 4 5. Plaintiff’s motion to compel the filing of defendants’ deposition transcripts (Dkt. No. 130), is denied without prejudice. SO ORDERED. DATED: January 7, 2013 5 6 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 kilg2485.reopen.disc. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?