Kilgore v. Mandeville et al

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/21/10 ORDERING that defendants shall, within 14 days of the filing date of this order, file a response addressing each of plaintiffs concerns set forth in his 78 Opposition and 79 Motion; Plaintiff may, within 14 days after service of defendants response, file a reply; and discovery deadline of September 10, 2010, and dispositive motion deadline of October 15, 2010, are vacated pending further order of this court.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Kilgore v. Mandeville et al Doc. 81 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IVAN KILGORE, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD MANDEVILLE, et al., Defendant. / Plaintiff has filed two briefs seeking this court's intervention in defendants' allegedly dilatory conduct and incomplete responses to plaintiff's discovery requests (Dkt. Nos. 78, 79), the latter ordered by this court on June 21, 2010 (Dkt. No. 73). Preliminary review of plaintiff's briefs indicates that his positions may have merit. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants shall, within 14 days of the filing date of this order, file a response addressing each of plaintiff's concerns set forth in his "Opposition" (Dkt. No. 78) and "Motion" (Dkt. No. 79); 2. Plaintiff may, within 14 days after service of defendants' response, file a reply; ORDER No. 2:07-cv-2485 GEB KJN P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 kilg2485.misc 3. The discovery deadline of September 10, 2010, and dispositive motion deadline of October 15, 2010, are vacated pending further order of this court. SO ORDERED. DATED: September 21, 2010 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?