Travelers Casualty v. Dunmore, et al

Filing 195

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/28/10 ORDERING that the court now VACATES the hearing on the Rule 12(e) motion for a more definite statement, 181 Plaintiff is instructed to re-notice the Rule 12(e) motion for a more definite statement, if appropriate. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
Travelers Casualty v. Dunmore, et al Doc. 195 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NO. CIV. S-07-2493 LKK/DAD 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. ORDER SIDNEY B. DUNMORE, an individual; SID DUNMORE TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2003, a California trust; SIDNEY B. DUNMORE, Trustee for Sid Dunmore Trust Dated February 28, 2003; DHI DEVELOPMENT, a California corporation, Defendants. / On October 7, 2010, plaintiff Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America filed a Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike and a Rule 12(e) Motion for a More Definite Statement as to the Niemi defendants' counterclaim. ECF No. 181. The motions were set for hearing on November 8, 2010. Travelers and the Niemi defendants later filed a stipulation, which this court approved, on the motion 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, Plaintiff, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 to strike. In the order granting the stipulation, this court took the motion to strike off calendar, subject to re-noticing by the plaintiff, if appropriate. Order Granting Stipulation, October 22, 2010, ECF No. 189. The court now VACATES the hearing on the Rule 12(e) motion for a more definite statement, ECF No. 181. Plaintiff is instructed to re-notice the Rule 12(e) motion for a more definite statement, if appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 28, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?