Travelers Casualty v. Dunmore, et al

Filing 294

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/7/14 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE to defendant filing a motion seeking relief pursuant to FRCP 36(b) 266 Motion for Protective Order; GRANTING 282 Motion to Compel. Defendant shall serve his responses to plaintiff's interrogatories and requests for production of documents which were the subject of the motion to compel on or before 3/24/14. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND
SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a
Connecticut corporation,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15
16

No. 2:07-cv-2493 TLN DAD

ORDER

v.
SIDNEY B. DUNMORE, an individual et
al.,

17

Defendants.

18
On March 7, 2014, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of defendant’s

19
20

motion for a protective order and plaintiff’s motion to compel. Attorney Daniel Welch appeared

21

on behalf of the plaintiff and attorney Gary Gorski appeared telephonically on behalf of the

22

defendant.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set

23
24

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 266) is denied without prejudice to

25
26

defendant filing of a motion seeking relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(b);
2. Plaintiff’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 282) is granted; and

27
28

/////
1

1

3. Defendant shall serve his responses to plaintiff’s interrogatories and requests for

2

production of documents which were the subject of the motion to compel on or before March 24,

3

2014.

4

Dated: March 7, 2014

5
6
7
8

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\travelers2493.oah.030714.docx

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2