Price v. Marshall

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/9/09 ORDERING that petitioner's March 23, 2009 request for an extension of time to file his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss 32 is granted nunc pro tunc.(Becknal, R)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:mp/4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM HENRY PRICE, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN R.E. BARNES, Respondent. / On March 23, 2009, petitioner requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to respondent's March 9, 2009 motion to dismiss. On March 27, 2009, petitioner filed his opposition. The court will deem petitioner's opposition timely filed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's March 23, 2009 request for an extension of time to file his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 32) is granted nunc pro tunc. DATED: April 9, 2009. ORDER No. CIV S-07-2525 GEB DAD P

pric2525.111