Cottrell v. Cook et al

Filing 70

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/24/11 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL M. COTTRELL, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 No. CIV S-07-2574 GEB EFB P vs. R.K. WONG, et al., Defendants. ORDER / On April 5, 2011, defendant filed a motion for terminating sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(3)(B). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. A responding party’s failure “to file written opposition or to file a statement of no 19 opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may 20 result in the imposition of sanctions.” L. R. 230(l). Failure to comply with any order or with the 21 Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or 22 Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” L. R. 110. The court may recommend this 23 action be dismissed with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if plaintiff disobeys an order or the 24 Local Rules. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1252 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not 25 abuse discretion in dismissing pro se plaintiff’s complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file 26 an amended complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 1 1 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to comply with local 2 rule regarding notice of change of address affirmed); 3 Plaintiff is advised that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of 4 opposition to the motion, and that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a 5 recommendation of dismissal. 6 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, within 30 days of the date of this order, 7 plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. 8 Failure to comply with this order will result in this action being dismissed without prejudice. 9 DATED: May 24, 2011. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?