Farr v. High Desert State Prison
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/17/09 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to these F&Rs due w/i 20 days; referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. (Benson, A.) Modified on 7/14/2009 (Carlos, K).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 vs. HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, Defendants. / In December 2007 plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS JEMEANS FARR, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2615 FCD KJM P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 17, 2009.
1 farr2615.fta
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?