Dodson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 02/05/08 GRANTING 9 Substitution of Attorney: attorney Hubbard info updated. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lynn Hubbard, III, SBN 69773 Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, SBN 212970 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC 12 Williamsburg Lane Chico, Ca 95926 530.895.3252 Attorneys for Plaintiff THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT DODSON, Plaintiff, vs. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. dba HOME DEPOT #1003; HD DEVELOPMENT of MARYLAND, INC. dba HD PROPERTIES of MARYLAND, Defendants. _____________________________ Case No. CIV.S-07-02623-GEB JFM Substitution of Attorneys and [Proposed] Order Thereon Dodson v. Home Depot U.S.A. , Inc., et al. CIV.S-07-02623-GEB -JFM Substitution of Attorneys and [Proposed] Order Thereon -1PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, ROBERT DODSON, hereby substitutes the DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC, 12 Williamsburg Lane, Chico, California 95926, telephone number (530) 895-3252, facsimile (530) 894-8244, email address usdceast@hubslaw.com, as attorneys of record in place and stead of THE LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD. I consent to the substitution. Dated: January 14, 2008 /s/ Robert Dodson ROBERT DODSON I consent to the substitution. Dated: January 14, 2008 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III LYNN HUBBARD, III I consent to the substitution. Dated: January 14, 2008 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III LYNN HUBBARD, III ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2008 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge Dodson v. Home Depot U.S.A. , Inc., et al. CIV.S-07-02623-GEB -JFM Substitution of Attorneys and [Proposed] Order Thereon -2PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?