Dodson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 02/05/08 GRANTING 9 Substitution of Attorney: attorney Hubbard info updated. (Benson, A)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Lynn Hubbard, III, SBN 69773 Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, SBN 212970 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC 12 Williamsburg Lane Chico, Ca 95926 530.895.3252 Attorneys for Plaintiff
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT DODSON, Plaintiff, vs. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. dba HOME DEPOT #1003; HD DEVELOPMENT of MARYLAND, INC. dba HD PROPERTIES of MARYLAND, Defendants. _____________________________
Case No. CIV.S-07-02623-GEB JFM Substitution of Attorneys and [Proposed] Order Thereon
Dodson v. Home Depot U.S.A. , Inc., et al. CIV.S-07-02623-GEB -JFM Substitution of Attorneys and [Proposed] Order Thereon
-1PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff, ROBERT DODSON, hereby substitutes the DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC, 12 Williamsburg Lane, Chico, California 95926, telephone number (530) 895-3252, facsimile (530) 894-8244, email address usdceast@hubslaw.com, as attorneys of record in place and stead of THE LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD. I consent to the substitution. Dated: January 14, 2008 /s/ Robert Dodson ROBERT DODSON I consent to the substitution. Dated: January 14, 2008 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III LYNN HUBBARD, III I consent to the substitution. Dated: January 14, 2008
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III LYNN HUBBARD, III ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2008
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
Dodson v. Home Depot U.S.A. , Inc., et al. CIV.S-07-02623-GEB -JFM Substitution of Attorneys and [Proposed] Order Thereon
-2PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?