Slaughter v. Sisto et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 01/22/09 ORDERING that a certificate of appealability is hereby ISSUED. (Streeter, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. D. K. SISTO, Respondent. ----oo0oo---Petitioner Terry L. Slaughter seeks to appeal from this court's order of January 8, 2009, dismissing this habeas corpus petition. Before defendant can appeal from this order, a 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); TERRY L. SLAUGHTER, Petitioner, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- NO. CIV. S-07-2628 WBS DAD P ORDER ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY certificate of appealability must issue. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. 2253 "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 2253(c)(2). 28 U.S.C. The certificate of appealability must "indicate 28 which specific issue or issues satisfy" the requirement. U.S.C. 2253(c)(3). 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A certificate of appealability should be granted for any issue that petitioner can demonstrate is "`debatable among jurists of reason,'" could be resolved differently by a different court, or is "`adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'" Jennings v. Woodford, 290 F.3d 1006, 1010 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983)). Judged by this standard, petitioner has made a sufficient showing to justify issuance of a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether he has a state-created liberty interest in how his sentence was calculated. Connor, 515 U.S. 472 (1995). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is hereby issued. DATED: January 22, 2009 Sandin v. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?