Hubbard v. Theus et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/31/08 ADOPTING 3 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS in full; pltf's 2 application to proceed IFP is DENIED; and this action is DISMISSED w/prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
(PS) Hubbard v. Theus, et al
Doc. 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. REGGIE THEUS, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On January 2, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. ///// ///// ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MYRNA HUBBARD, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2646 FCD DAD PS
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 denied; and
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 2, 2008, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff's December 10, 2007 application to proceed in forma pauperis is
3. This action is dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. DATED: January 31, 2008.
_______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?