Riches v. No Child Left Behind Act et al

Filing 3

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/18/07 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew.Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)

(PC)Riches v. No Child Left Behind Act et al

Doc. 3

Case 2:07-cv-02653-LEW-DAD

Document 3

Filed 12/18/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a federal prisoner in South Carolina, has named Margaret Spellings, the U.S. Secretary of Education and the No Child Left Behind Act as defendants in this action. Plaintiff alleges that defendants have left him behind. Plaintiff fails to show that this is an appropriate venue for this action, see 28 U.S.C. § 1391 et. seq., or that his claim is cognizable, 28 U.S.C. § 1330 et. seq. Therefore, plaintiff's complaint is frivolous and the court will recommend that it be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2653 LEW DAD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Case 2:07-cv-02653-LEW-DAD

Document 3

Filed 12/18/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: December 18, 2007.

DAD:9 rich2653.56

2