Monteon v. Director of Corrections, et al

Filing 5

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/8/08 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)

(HC) Monteon v. Director of Corrections, et al

Doc. 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Respondents. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / By an order filed December 26, 2007, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALFREDO J. MONTEON, Petitioner, vs. DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS No. CIV S-07-2725 FCD DAD P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: February 8, 2008.

DAD:lg mont2725.fifp.fta

2