Wilson v. Walker et al

Filing 43

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/23/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 2/15/11, are adopted in full; Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; the Clerk is directed to close the case; and the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
(HC) Wilson v. Walker et al Doc. 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. J. WALKER, Warden, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE WILSON, Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-2752 GEB EFB P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full; 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 15, 2011, are adopted in 2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; 3. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and 4. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Dated: March 23, 2011 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?