Sharp v. Sisto

Filing 13

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/8/2010 ORDERING that this action is REOPENED; w/in 21 days, respondents to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to file a timely answer to the petition; w/in that time, respondents shall answer the petition.(Yin, K)

(HC)Sharp v. Sisto

Doc. 13

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 //// //// //// //// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DARRELL T. SHARP, Petitioner, vs. D. K. SISTO, et al., Respondents. / On July 7, 2008, this action was stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2008), reh'g en banc granted, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. 2008). Respondents were ordered to file a motion to lift the stay and to answer the petition within thirty days of issuance of the mandate in Hayward. More than thirty days has passed since issuance of the mandate in Hayward. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is reopened; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE No. 2:07-cv-2756 MCE KJN P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
sharp2756.ord

2. Within twenty-one days of the date of this order, respondents shall show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to file a timely answer to the petition; within that time, respondents shall answer the petition. DATED: July 8, 2010

_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2