Johnson v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 2/5/08 ORDERING OfficeMax to file and serve a responsive pleading to the complaint shall be extended 30 days, such that a responsive pleading is now due no later than 3/7/08.(Anderson, J)

Johnson v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al

Doc. 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Richard M. Jacobson, Esq. - Bar No. 114520 JACOBSON MARKHAM, L.L.P. 8950 Cal Center Drive, Suite 210 Sacramento, California 95826 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant, OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KOBRA PROPERTIES and STONEGATE ) CONSTRUCTION, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) )

CASE NO. 2:07-CV-02790-LEW-KJM STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING [Local Rule 6-144(a)]

Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson and defendant, OfficeMax Incorporated hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to East. Distr. Local Rule 6-144(a) that time for defendant OfficeMax to file and serve a responsive pleading to the complaint shall be extended thirty days, such that a responsive pleading is now due no later than March 7, 2008. IT IS SO STIPULATED. SCOTT N. JOHNSON

/s/ Scott N. Johnson, Esq. By: SCOTT N. JOHNSON Plaintiff // // /// 1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Dockets.Justia.com

Jacobson Markham LLP Sacramento, California

1 JACOBSON MARKHAM, L.L.P. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Jacobson Markham LLP Sacramento, California

/s/ Richard M. Jacobson, Esq. By: RICHARD M. JACOBSON Attorneys for Defendant, OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: 2/5/2008 /s/ Ronald S. W. Lew Judge of United States District Court

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT