Clem et al v. Riebe et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/20/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations ADOPTED; dfts' motion to dismiss 48 is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 41(b); clerk is directed to close case; CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PS) Clem et al v. Riebe et al Doc. 51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KRISTA D. CLEM, JOHN O'SULLIVAN, Plaintiffs, vs. TODD RIEBE, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER No. CIV S-08-0013 FCD EFB PS On July 8, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 granted; ADOPTED; Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 8, 2010, are 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, Dckt. No. 48, is 3. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), based on plaintiffs' failure to prosecute this action; and 4. The Clerk is directed to close the case. DATED: August 20, 2010. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?