Martinez v. City of Williams, et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 07/27/10 DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
Martinez v. City of Williams, et al
Doc. 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BRUCE A. KILDAY, ESQ., SBN. 66415 Email: bkilday@akk-law.com ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF Attorneys at Law 601 University Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 564-6100
Telecopier: (916) 564-6263
Attorneys for Defendants, City of Williams, Williams Police Department UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No.: 2:08-cv-00030-LKK-DAD ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CITY OF WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS POLICE ) DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE, JAMES ) ) P. SASO, OFFICER MICHAEL RYNEARSON, OFFICER IVAN ) MADLONADO and Does 1 to 30, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) MARTIN O. MARTINEZ, The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to the City of Williams (also sued herein as Williams Police Department). It is further stipulated that each party is to bear its own costs, including any attorney's fees Dated: July 19, 2010 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF /s/ Bruce A. Kilday By:_________________________________ BRUCE A. KILDAY Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF WILLIAMS, CHIEF JAMES SASO, OFFICER MICHAEL RYNEARSON AND OFFICER IVAN MALDONADO
{Stipulation for Dismissal; 00040530}-1-
Stipulation for Dismissal
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
{Stipulation for Dismissal; 00040530}-2-
Dated: July 26, 2010
MORENO & RIVERA /s/ Jesse M. Rivera By:____________________________ JESSE M. RIVERA Attorneys for Plaintiffs ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 27, 2010.
Stipulation for Dismissal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?