Lancaster v. Carey et al

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/02/11 ordering the parties to this action shall each, no later than 14 days from the date of the order, submit confidential statements as described below. The confidential statements shall no t be served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead delivered by mail, fax, email or personal delivery to the court's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division at the address, fax number or email address below and marked "Confidential". Such statements shall be limited 5 pages. (See order for further details) (cc: ADR Director)(Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DAVID GENE LANCASTER,

11
12
13
14
15
16

No. CIV S-08-0051 LKK GGH P

Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL
STATEMENTS RE: CASE SELECTION FOR
PRISONER SETTLEMENT PROGRAM

TOM L. CAREY, Warden, et al.,
Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
/

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in

17

this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against defendants

18

Herrera and Fry, and is scheduled for pretrial conference on October 28, 2011; for a trial

19

confirmation hearing on January 17, 2010; and for jury trial commencing April 10, 2012. See

20

Further Scheduling Order, filed on July 26, 2011.

21

The parties to this action shall each, no later than fourteen(14) days from the date

22

of the order, submit confidential statements as described below. The confidential statements

23

shall not be served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead, delivered by mail,

24

fax, email or personal delivery to the court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division at

25
1

1

the address, fax number or email address below and marked “Confidential.” Such statements

2

shall be limited to five (5) pages and shall include the following:

3
4

1) the party’s assessment of whether the instant action is of the type that would
benefit from a settlement proceeding;

5
6

2) the party’s assessment of what factors, if any, will prevent settlement of this
matter prior to trial; and

7
8

3) any additional information the court may find useful in determining whether to
set this matter for a settlement conference.

9

Should the Court determine this action to be appropriate for referral to the

10

Prisoner Settlement Program, the Court will set this matter for settlement conference before a

11

magistrate judge or district judge.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 2, 2011

14

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
GGH:009/sp

16

lanc0051.ord

17
cc:
18
19
20

ADR Division, Attention: Sujean Park
US District Court
501 I Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax: [phone]
email: [e-mail]

21
22
23
24
25
2