Leyva v. Moreno et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K Delaney on 8/15/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of time 64 is DENIED as MOOT; Defendant's MOTION to MODIFY the Scheduling Order 65 is GRANTED; and The 10/22/10 Scheduling Order 42 is VACATED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 s 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH M. LEYVA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-08-0076 LKK CKD P MORENO, et al., 14 Defendant. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 9, 2011, plaintiff moved for a thirty-day 18 extension of time to file a pretrial statement. (Dkt. No. #64.) On August 12, 2011, defendants 19 moved to modify the scheduling order. (Dkt. No. 65.) As defendants’ motion for summary 20 judgment is pending, along with two discovery motions by plaintiff, the court will vacate the 21 scheduling order issued October 22, 2010, and refrain from setting new deadlines until the 22 dispositive motion is resolved. 23 \\\\ 24 \\\\ 25 \\\\ 26 \\\\ 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. #64) is denied as moot; 3 2. Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order (Dkt. No. #65) is granted; 4 and 5 3. The October 22, 2010 scheduling order (Dkt. No. #42) is vacated. 6 Dated: August 15, 2011 7 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 2 leyv0076.ord 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?