Leyva v. Moreno et al
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K Delaney on 8/15/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of time 64 is DENIED as MOOT; Defendant's MOTION to MODIFY the Scheduling Order 65 is GRANTED; and The 10/22/10 Scheduling Order 42 is VACATED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
s
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JOSEPH M. LEYVA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-08-0076 LKK CKD P
MORENO, et al.,
14
Defendant.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 9, 2011, plaintiff moved for a thirty-day
18
extension of time to file a pretrial statement. (Dkt. No. #64.) On August 12, 2011, defendants
19
moved to modify the scheduling order. (Dkt. No. 65.) As defendants’ motion for summary
20
judgment is pending, along with two discovery motions by plaintiff, the court will vacate the
21
scheduling order issued October 22, 2010, and refrain from setting new deadlines until the
22
dispositive motion is resolved.
23
\\\\
24
\\\\
25
\\\\
26
\\\\
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. #64) is denied as moot;
3
2. Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order (Dkt. No. #65) is granted;
4
and
5
3. The October 22, 2010 scheduling order (Dkt. No. #42) is vacated.
6
Dated: August 15, 2011
7
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
2
leyv0076.ord
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?