Flood v. National Football League et al
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING in full 37 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/7/09. Pltf's 11/5/08 motion to amend is DENIED; and dfts' 10/23/08 motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.(Kastilahn, A)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On November 21, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 ORDER vs. DAVID RODERICK FLOOD, Plaintiff, 2:08-cv-0091-GEB-JFM-PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full;
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 21, 2008, are adopted in
2. Plaintiff's November 5, 2008 motion to amend (docket no. 32) is denied; and 3. Defendants' October 23, 2008 motion to dismiss (docket no. 26) is granted and the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: January 7, 2009
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?