Laucella v. Sisto

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 09/03/10 ORDERING compliance with the existing 32 02/08/10 order. The order has been enforceable since 06/10/10 and Respondent has failed to comply with the terms of the order by releasing Mr. Lau cella from state custody. Within 48 hours, Respondent shall: (1) File a notice with this Court confirming that Laucella has been released from state custody and (2) Absent confirmation of release, Respondent shall appear in this Court to Show Cause why Respondent should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with this Court's order. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
(HC) Laucella v. Sisto Doc. 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, this court orders compliance with the existing February 8, 2010 order. The order has been enforceable since June 10, 2010, and Respondent has failed to comply with the terms of the order by releasing Mr. Laucella from state custody. Within 48 hours of the filing of this Order, Respondent shall: (1) File a notice with this Court confirming that Laucella has been released from state custody (2) Absent confirmation of release, Respondent shall appear in this Court to Show Cause why Respondent should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with this Court's order. vs. D.K. SISTO, et al, Warden, California Facility, Respondent. ORDER ROBERT LAUCELLA, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-0109 LKK CHS P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [Proposed] Order Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 3, 2010 [Proposed] Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?