Allen v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 13

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin S. Chang on 10/7/09. Pltf, shall Show Cause, in writing, on or before 10/27/2009, why the Court should not recommend dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HERBERT O. ALLEN, JR. #T-80221, ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) vs. ) ) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS; SUSAN L. HUBBARD; ) S. HEMENWAY; PAT MANDEVILLE; L. ) JENSEN, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 2:08-00119 DAE-KSC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE On January 17, 2008, Plaintiff Herbert O. Allen, proceeding pro se, brought this prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 11, 2009, the Court issued an Order Denying Plaintiff's Request for Service of Process (Doc. No. 12). On March 31, 2009, the mail was returned Since then, Plaintiff has not to the Court as undeliverable. communicated with the Court nor has Plaintiff provided the Court with a current mailing address. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff, to show cause, in writing, on or before October 27, 2009, why the Court should not recommend dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 7, 2009. _____________________________ Kevin S.C. Chang United States Magistrate Judge CV 2:08-00119 DAE-KSC; ALLEN V. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?