Holdman v. Hedgepath

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/1/2010 ORDERING that ptnr's 23 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED; and ptnr's 24 request for an extension of time is DENIED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(HC) Holdman v. Hedgepath Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ANTHONY HEDGEPATH, Respondent. / Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. The court notes that this action is stayed so petitioner can exhaust state court remedies with respect to certain claims. Considering the stay, it is not clear why petitioner believes he is in need of counsel. Therefore, petitioner's request for counsel will be denied without prejudice to petitioner's re-submitting his motion with a specific explanation as to why he believes he needs counsel, with any information petitioner deems relevant clarifying the status of his efforts to exhaust state court remedies. Petitioner has also requested an extension of time. However, there do not appear to be any deadlines pending on the court's docket. Therefore, petitioner's request will be denied. ///// ///// ///// ///// Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JASON TYRONE HOLDMAN, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-0183 WBS KJM P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1/mp hold0183.110 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (# 23) is denied without prejudice as described above; and 2. Petitioner's request for an extension of time (#24) is denied. DATED: November 1, 2010.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?