Seefeldt v. CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al.,
Filing
107
ORDER ADOPTING 106 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/18/2011. This action is DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 41 (b). (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BRIAN S. SEEFELDT,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. 2:08-cv-0232 GEB JFM (PC)
vs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
ORDER
/
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On [date], the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and
25
recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility
26
/////
1
1
to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f),
2
service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
3
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
4
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
5
ORDERED that:
6
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 4, 2011, are adopted in full; and
7
2. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
8
Dated: May 18, 2011
9
10
11
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?