Seefeldt v. CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al.,

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/23/09 ORDERING that 81 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer is GRANTED; 83 Motion for entry of judgment is DENIED. Defendants Hirschler, Newman, Mendoza and Russell are granted until 12/2/09 to file and serve a responsive pleading. (Dillon, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. / Defendants Hirschler, Newman, Mendoza and Russell have timely requested an extension of time to file a responsive pleading. Plaintiff opposes the motion and seeks entry of judgment. Good cause appearing, defendants' request will be granted. Defendants will be granted an extension of time until December 2, 2009 to file and serve a responsive pleading. As defendants are not in default, plaintiff's motion for entry of judgment will be denied. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' October 28, 2009 motion for an extension of time is granted; 2. Defendants Hirschler, Newman, Mendoza and Russell are granted until December 2, 2009 to file and serve a responsive pleading; and ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN S. SEEFELDT, Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-0232-JFM (PC)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
12 s e e f 0 2 3 2 .3 6

3. Plaintiff's November 6, 2009 motion for entry of judgment is denied. DATED: November 23, 2009.

2