Neal v. Campbell et al

Filing 47

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/19/09 ORDERING that 45 Supplement to Amended Complaint be DISREGARDED and placed in the court's file. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff is informed that if, in the future, he files an amended complaint, he must also file a motion seeking leave to amend under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the amended complaint will be disregarded. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SEAN BAPTISTE NEAL, Plaintiff, vs. ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has filed a supplement to his complaint. However, Local Rule 15-220 requires that complaints be complete in themselves without reference to any prior pleading. This is because, as a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes a previous complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Therefore, plaintiff's October 6, 2009 supplement to his complaint shall be placed in the court's file and disregarded.1 DATED: October 19, 2009. ORDER No. CIV S-08-0313 GEB KJM P 1 neal0313.sup

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?