Crime, Justice & America, Inc., et al vs. Reniff
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/21/2012 DENYING 58 Motion for Judgment and 60 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
CRIME, JUSTICE & AMERICA, INC.,
a California Corporation; and
RAY HRDLICKA, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
15
JERRY W. SMITH, in his official
capacity of Sheriff of the
County of Butte, California,
16
Defendant.
________________________________
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:08-cv-00343-GEB-EFB
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
17
18
Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment, filed on November 2,
19
2012, (ECF No. 58), and Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment,
20
filed on November 16, 2012, (ECF No. 60), are denied since the motions
21
concern
22
pleading, since Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on December
23
18, 2012. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc., v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc.,
24
896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating “an amended pleading
25
supersedes the original”); Spokane Cnty. Legal Servs., Inc. v. Legal
26
Servs. Corp., 614 F.2d 662, 666 (9th Cir. 1980) (approving “deni[al of
27
Defendant’s] motion for summary judgment on the basis that it was moot”
28
after “the filing of the second amended complaint”); Williams v. Conn.
Plaintiffs’
Complaint,
which
1
is
no
longer
the
operative
1
Gen. Life Ins. Co., No. CIV 06-2747 PHX RCB, 2008 WL 4183372, at *2 (D.
2
Ariz. Sept. 10, 2008) (denying as moot summary judgment motion after
3
filing of amended complaint even though there may “be no meaningful
4
distinction between the original and the amended complaint, at least
5
insofar as defendants frame their summary judgment arguments” because
6
“[t]he court is not free to speculate in that regard”).
7
Dated:
December 21, 2012
8
9
10
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?