Crime, Justice & America, Inc., et al vs. Reniff

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/21/2012 DENYING 58 Motion for Judgment and 60 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 CRIME, JUSTICE & AMERICA, INC., a California Corporation; and RAY HRDLICKA, an individual, Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 15 JERRY W. SMITH, in his official capacity of Sheriff of the County of Butte, California, 16 Defendant. ________________________________ 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:08-cv-00343-GEB-EFB ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 17 18 Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment, filed on November 2, 19 2012, (ECF No. 58), and Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, 20 filed on November 16, 2012, (ECF No. 60), are denied since the motions 21 concern 22 pleading, since Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on December 23 18, 2012. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc., v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 24 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating “an amended pleading 25 supersedes the original”); Spokane Cnty. Legal Servs., Inc. v. Legal 26 Servs. Corp., 614 F.2d 662, 666 (9th Cir. 1980) (approving “deni[al of 27 Defendant’s] motion for summary judgment on the basis that it was moot” 28 after “the filing of the second amended complaint”); Williams v. Conn. Plaintiffs’ Complaint, which 1 is no longer the operative 1 Gen. Life Ins. Co., No. CIV 06-2747 PHX RCB, 2008 WL 4183372, at *2 (D. 2 Ariz. Sept. 10, 2008) (denying as moot summary judgment motion after 3 filing of amended complaint even though there may “be no meaningful 4 distinction between the original and the amended complaint, at least 5 insofar as defendants frame their summary judgment arguments” because 6 “[t]he court is not free to speculate in that regard”). 7 Dated: December 21, 2012 8 9 10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?