Crime, Justice & America, Inc., et al vs. Reniff

Filing 95

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/7/14 ORDERING that the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order, is MODIFED. The close of discovery deadline is EXTENDED to 3/10/2014. All other cutoff deadlines will remain unchanged.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 Bruce S. Alpert, County Counsel OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF BUTTE 25 County Center Drive, Suite 201 Oroville, CA 95965 Tel: (530) 538-7621 Fax: (530) 538-6891 9 Attorneys for Defendant JERRY SMITH 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No.: 2:08-cv-00343-TLN-EFB CRIME, JUSTICE & AMERICA, INC., a California Corporation; and RAY HRDLICKA, in individual, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. JERRY SMITH, in his official capacity of Sheriff of the County of Butte, California, Defendant. 20 / 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs CRIME, JUSTICE 24 & AMERICA, INC. and RAY HRDLICKA and Defendant JERRY SMITH, by and through their 25 undersigned Counsel, pursuant to Local Rules 143 as follows: 26 1. The parties respectfully request that the District Court modify the Amended Pretrial 27 Scheduling Order (Docket No. 80) to allow an approximate sixty (60) additional days to the close of 28 discovery cutoff date, based on good cause appearing therefore as more fully set forth below. 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 1 2. On July 17, 2013, the Court issued an Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order modifying 2 certain discovery cutoff dates. Specifically, the Court set the following deadlines: 3 Close of discovery January 10, 2014 4 Expert witness disclosure deadline March 10, 2014 5 Supplemental and Rebuttal witness disclosure deadline March 30, 2014 6 Pretrial motion hearing deadline July 3, 2014 7 Pretrial Conference September 11, 2014 8 Trial November 17, 2014 9 3. The parties recently engaged in private mediation on December 13, 2013. The parties 10 wish to continue those discussions in good faith. Moreover, the calendars of counsel for the parties 11 have become congested to the point of mutually requiring additional time to complete discovery in 12 light of the continued discussions. 13 14 15 4. The parties previously requested once before to extend the discovery deadline. With this request, no other dates are being requested to be modified. 5. Therefore, the parties respectfully submit that good cause exists to revise the Amended 16 Pretrial Scheduling Order dated July 17, 2013, and therefore request modifications of the Pretrial 17 Scheduling Order as to the close of discovery only to extend the deadline to March 10, 2014. All 18 other dates are to remain unchanged. 19 20 21 This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any facsimile or electronic signature shall be as valid as an original signature. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 22 23 DATED: January 2, 2014 FREEMAN LAW FIRM, INC. 24 25 26 By /s/ Spencer D. Freeman Spencer D. Freeman (as authorized on 1/2/14) Attorney for Plaintiffs 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 1 DATED: January 2, 2014 2 3 PORTER SCOTT A Professional Corporation By 4 /s/ John R. Whitefleet John R. Whitefleet Attorney for Defendant 5 6 ORDER 7 8 Having reviewed the above stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 9 ORDERED that the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order, be modified. The close of discovery deadline 10 11 is extended to March 10, 2014. All other cutoff deadlines will remain unchanged. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: January 7, 2014 14 15 16 17 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?