Crime, Justice & America, Inc., et al vs. Reniff
Filing
95
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/7/14 ORDERING that the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order, is MODIFED. The close of discovery deadline is EXTENDED to 3/10/2014. All other cutoff deadlines will remain unchanged.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
Bruce S. Alpert, County Counsel
OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL
COUNTY OF BUTTE
25 County Center Drive, Suite 201
Oroville, CA 95965
Tel: (530) 538-7621
Fax: (530) 538-6891
9
Attorneys for Defendant JERRY SMITH
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No.: 2:08-cv-00343-TLN-EFB
CRIME, JUSTICE & AMERICA, INC., a
California
Corporation;
and
RAY
HRDLICKA, in individual,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY
AMENDED
PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
vs.
JERRY SMITH, in his official capacity of
Sheriff of the County of Butte, California,
Defendant.
20
/
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs CRIME, JUSTICE
24
& AMERICA, INC. and RAY HRDLICKA and Defendant JERRY SMITH, by and through their
25
undersigned Counsel, pursuant to Local Rules 143 as follows:
26
1.
The parties respectfully request that the District Court modify the Amended Pretrial
27
Scheduling Order (Docket No. 80) to allow an approximate sixty (60) additional days to the close of
28
discovery cutoff date, based on good cause appearing therefore as more fully set forth below.
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1
2.
On July 17, 2013, the Court issued an Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order modifying
2
certain discovery cutoff dates. Specifically, the Court set the following deadlines:
3
Close of discovery
January 10, 2014
4
Expert witness disclosure deadline
March 10, 2014
5
Supplemental and Rebuttal witness disclosure deadline
March 30, 2014
6
Pretrial motion hearing deadline
July 3, 2014
7
Pretrial Conference
September 11, 2014
8
Trial
November 17, 2014
9
3.
The parties recently engaged in private mediation on December 13, 2013. The parties
10
wish to continue those discussions in good faith. Moreover, the calendars of counsel for the parties
11
have become congested to the point of mutually requiring additional time to complete discovery in
12
light of the continued discussions.
13
14
15
4.
The parties previously requested once before to extend the discovery deadline. With
this request, no other dates are being requested to be modified.
5.
Therefore, the parties respectfully submit that good cause exists to revise the Amended
16
Pretrial Scheduling Order dated July 17, 2013, and therefore request modifications of the Pretrial
17
Scheduling Order as to the close of discovery only to extend the deadline to March 10, 2014. All
18
other dates are to remain unchanged.
19
20
21
This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any facsimile or electronic signature shall be
as valid as an original signature.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22
23
DATED: January 2, 2014
FREEMAN LAW FIRM, INC.
24
25
26
By
/s/ Spencer D. Freeman
Spencer D. Freeman (as authorized on 1/2/14)
Attorney for Plaintiffs
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1
DATED: January 2, 2014
2
3
PORTER SCOTT
A Professional Corporation
By
4
/s/ John R. Whitefleet
John R. Whitefleet
Attorney for Defendant
5
6
ORDER
7
8
Having reviewed the above stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY
9
ORDERED that the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order, be modified. The close of discovery deadline
10
11
is extended to March 10, 2014. All other cutoff deadlines will remain unchanged.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: January 7, 2014
14
15
16
17
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?