Golden v. Feudner et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/14/10 granting 31 Motion to modify scheduling order. Defendant Feudner shall take plaintiff's deposition on or before 03/01/10. Defendant Feudner shall file any dispositive motion which he wishes to pursue on or before 05/24/10. Except as set forth in this order, the court's 09/21/09 scheduling order remains in effect. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2010; 3. Defendant Feudner shall file any dispositive motion which he wishes to pursue on or before May 24, 2010; and 1 vs. S. FEUDNER, et al., Defendants. / Defendant Feudner has filed a motion to modify the scheduling order in this case in light of technical difficulties defense counsel encountered when attempting to take plaintiff's video deposition on January 8, 2010. Specifically, defendant Feudner requests an extension of time to take plaintiff's deposition and to file a dispositive motion in this matter. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's January 13, 2010 motion to modify the scheduling order (Doc. No. 31) is granted; 2. Defendant Feudner shall take plaintiff's deposition on or before March 1, ORDER EDWIN GOLDEN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-0356 GEB DAD P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:9 gold0356.41mod 4. Except as set forth in this order, the court's September 21, 2009 scheduling order remains in effect. DATED: January 14, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?