Golden v. Feudner et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/10 ORDERING that Scheduling order dates related to defendants pretrial statement (July 23,2010), the pretrial conference (July 30, 2010), and jury trial (October 26, 2010) are VACATED. The remainder of the courts September 21, 2009 scheduling order shall remain in effect; and the court will issue a revised scheduling order, if necessary, after the court has ruled upon defendants May 24, 2010 motion for summary judgment.(Dillon, M)

(PC) Golden v. Feudner et al

Doc. 51

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EDWIN GOLDEN, Plaintiff, vs. S. FEUDNER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendant's motion to modify the scheduling order in this action. In the pending motion, defendant argues that the deadline for pretrial statements and the date for trial in this case should be suspended until the court rules on defendant's May 24, 2010 motion for summary judgment.1 In particular, defendant contends that he should not be required to file a pretrial statement at this time because it remains unclear as to what claims, if any, this action will proceed to trial on. The court agrees. ///// Defendant's motion is still pending before the court and will be ruled upon in due 1
Dockets.Justia.com

No. CIV S-08-0356 GEB DAD P

ORDER

26

course.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:sj gold0356.41.vac

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Scheduling order dates related to defendant's pretrial statement (July 23, 2010), the pretrial conference (July 30, 2010), and jury trial (October 26, 2010) are vacated. The remainder of the court's September 21, 2009 scheduling order shall remain in effect; and 2. The court will issue a revised scheduling order, if necessary, after the court has ruled upon defendant's May 24, 2010 motion for summary judgment. DATED: August 25, 2010.

2