Waddle v. Garrett, et al

Filing 43

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/26/2010 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerkof the Court shall bear case number 2:08-cv-00372-KJM. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge." See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the v. ORDER GARRETT, et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ JEREMY WADDLE, Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-00372-MCE-KJM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the magistrate judge. The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. /// /// /// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:08-cv-00372-KJM. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED. Dated: April 26, 2010 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. DATED: April 26, 2010 KIMBERLY J. MUELLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?