Washington v. Mohammed et al

Filing 84

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/24/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion to set trial date (Doc. 70 ) and motion to compel (Doc. 73 ) are DENIED without prejudice. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN WASHINGTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. ORDER SALEM MOHAMMED, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 No. 2:08-cv-0386-KJM-CMK-P / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motion to set a trial date (Doc. 70) and 20 motion to compel (Doc. 73). Both of these motions were filed prematurely, and will be denied 21 without prejudice on that basis. This case has a rather complicated history. However, after 22 significant proceedings, an answer was filed on August 13, 2015 (Doc. 75). The court then 23 issued a scheduling order, opening discovery and setting appropriate deadlines (Doc. 76). 24 The two motions at issue in this order were both filed prior to the answer and 25 scheduling order. As such, plaintiff’s request for the court to set a trial date is premature. The 26 parties will need to complete discovery and file any dispositive motions deemed appropriate prior 1 1 to the court setting a trial date. Similarly, plaintiff’s motion to compel was filed prior to answer 2 and the court issuing the scheduling order and opening discovery. Until an answer is filed, the 3 case is not at issue, and discovery cannot commence. Thus, any discovery requests plaintiff sent 4 prior to the filing of the answer and scheduling order were premature and the defendants had no 5 obligation to respond. Now that the case is at issue and the scheduling order in place, discovery 6 has commenced. It appears there are additional discovery issues, which the court will address in 7 a separate order. 8 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to set trial date (Doc. 70) and motion to compel (Doc. 73) are denied without prejudice. 10 11 12 13 DATED: March 24, 2016 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?