Crime, Justice & America, Inc. et al v. McGinness, Sheriff
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/16/13 DENYING 59 Motion for Entry of Judgment and 61 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
CRIME, JUSTICE & AMERICA, INC.,
a California corporation; and
RAY HRDLICKA, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
11
v.
12
13
14
15
16
SCOTT JONES, in his official
capacity of Sheriff of the
County of Sacramento,
California,
Defendant.
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:08-cv-00394-GEB-EFB
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
17
Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment, filed on November 2,
18
2012, (ECF No. 59), and Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment,
19
filed on November 16, 2012, (ECF No. 61), are denied because the motions
20
concern
21
pleading, since Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on January
22
15, 2013. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc., v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc.,
23
896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating “an amended pleading
24
supersedes the original”); Spokane Cnty. Legal Servs., Inc. v. Legal
25
Servs. Corp., 614 F.2d 662, 666 (9th Cir. 1980) (approving “deni[al of
26
Defendant’s] motion for summary judgment” due to “the filing of the
27
second amended complaint”); Williams v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., No.
28
CIV 06-2747 PHX RCB, 2008 WL 4183372, at *2 (D. Ariz. Sept. 10, 2008)
Plaintiffs’
Complaint,
which
1
is
no
longer
the
operative
1
(denying summary judgment motion after filing of amended complaint even
2
though there may “be no meaningful distinction between the original and
3
the amended complaint, at least insofar as defendants frame their
4
summary judgment
5
speculate in that regard”).
6
Dated:
arguments,”
because
“[t]he
court
is
not
free to
January 16, 2013
7
8
9
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?