Carroll v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 24

ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve * Amended Complaint * filed on * 12/11/2009,* on * S. Sury Adevara, E. Mazin*, Service Deadline set for 5/24/2010 signed by District Judge Susan Oki Mollway on 1/15/2010. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERNON D. CARROLL, vs. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:08-CV-408 SOM ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS S. SURY ADEVARA, E. MAZIN Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. By order filed December 22, 2009, the court determined that Plaintiff's Complaint states a cognizable claim for relief against the following Defendants in their individual capacities only: S. SURY ADEVARA AND E. MAZIN. The court further ordered Plaintiff to provide information for service of process on form USM-285, a completed summons, and sufficient copies of the complaint for service. required papers on January 4, 2010. ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward the Plaintiff filed the Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY instructions for service of process, the completed summons, copies of the Complaint, and copies of this order to the United States Marshal. 2. Within ten days from the date of this order, the United States Marshal is directed to notify Defendants listed above (Adevara and Mazin) of the commencement of this action and to request a waiver of service of summons in accordance with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3. The United States Marshal is directed to retain the sealed summons and a copy of the complaint in their file for future use. 4. The United States Marshal shall file returned waivers of service of summons as well as any requests for waivers that are returned as undelivered as soon as they are received. 5. If a waiver of service of summons is not returned by a Defendant within sixty days from the date of mailing the request for waiver, the United States Marshal shall: a. Personally serve process and a copy of this order upon the Defendant pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c) and shall command all necessary assistance from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDC) to execute this order. The United States Marshal shall maintain the confidentiality of all information provided by the CDC pursuant to this order. b. Within ten days after personal service is effected, the United States Marshal shall file the return of service for the Defendant, along with evidence of any attempts to secure a waiver of service of summons and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on said Defendant. Said costs shall be enumerated on the USM-285 form 2 and shall include the costs incurred by the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 12(a). 7. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, 6. Marshal's office for photocopying additional copies of the summons and complaint and for preparing new USM-285 forms, if required. Costs of service will be taxed against the personally served Defendant in accordance with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). Defendants shall reply to the Complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. motions for summary judgment, motions concerning discovery, motions pursuant to Rules 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 55, 56, 59, and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and motions pursuant to Local Rule 11-110 shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 78230(m). Failure to oppose such a motion timely may be deemed a Opposition to all other waiver of opposition to the motion. motions need be filed only as directed by the court. 8. If Plaintiff is released from prison at any time during the pendency of this case, any party may request application of other provisions of Local Rule 78-230 in lieu of Local Rule 78-230(m). In the absence of a court order granting such a request, the provisions of Local Rule 78-230(m) will govern all motions described in #7 above regardless of plaintiff's custodial status. See Local Rule 1-102(d). 9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003), Plaintiff is advised of the following requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies made by Defendant pursuant to non-enumerated Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a motion is a request for dismissal of The Defendant may submit unexhausted claims without prejudice. affidavits or declarations under penalty of perjury and admissible documentation to support the motion to dismiss. To oppose the motion, Plaintiff may likewise file declarations under penalty of perjury and admissible documentation. Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and Plaintiff calls to the court's attention those parts of the complaint upon which Plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations by other persons who have personal knowledge of relevant matters. Plaintiff may also rely upon written records, but Plaintiff must prove that the records are what Plaintiff claims they are. If Plaintiff fails to contradict Defendant's evidence with admissible evidence, the court may rely on the Defendant's evidence. In the event both sides submit matters outside the pleadings, the court may look beyond the pleadings and decide disputed issues of fact. If Plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the 4 Defendant's motion. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 If the Defendant's motion to dismiss, whether opposed or unopposed, is granted, Plaintiff's unexhausted claims will be dismissed without prejudice. 10. Pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1035 (1999), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), Plaintiff is advised of the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment made by Defendants pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a motion is a request for an order for judgment in favor of Defendants without trial. A Defendant's motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the Defendants contend are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the Defendants to judgment. To oppose a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. the following ways. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and Plaintiff calls to the court's attention those parts of the complaint upon which Plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that Plaintiff believes prove Plaintiff's claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely upon written records, but Plaintiff must prove that the records are what Plaintiff claims they are. Plaintiff may rely upon all or any 5 part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this proceeding. Plaintiff fails to contradict the Defendants' evidence with counteraffidavits or other admissible evidence, the Defendants' evidence may be taken as the truth and the Defendants' motion for summary judgment granted. If there is some good reason why such If facts are not available to Plaintiff when required to oppose a motion for summary judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone considering the Defendants' motion. If Plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion or a request to postpone consideration of the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the Defendants' motion. If the Defendants' motion for summary judgment, whether opposed or unopposed, is granted, judgment will be entered for the Defendants without a trial and the case will be closed. 11. A motion or opposition supported by unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken. 12. Each party shall keep the court informed of a Any current address at all times while the action is pending. change of address must be reported promptly to the court in a separate document captioned for this case and entitled "Notice of Change of Address." A notice of change of address must be Pursuant to Local Rule 83- properly served on other parties. 182(f), service of documents at the record address of a party is fully effective. Failure to inform the court of a change of 6 address may result in the imposition of sanctions including 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7 Carroll v. Adevara et al., Civil No. 2:08-00408 SOM; ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS. dismissal of the action. 13. The Clerk of the Court shall serve upon Plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court. 14. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the Local Rules of Court may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, dismissal of the action or entry of default. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Local Rule 11-110. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 15, 2010 /s/ Susan Oki Mollway Susan Oki Mollway Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?