Gray v. City of West Sacramento
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/9/09 ORDERING that the FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS filed 12/15/08 17 are ADOPTED in full. Defendant's 11/14/08 MOTION TO DISMISS 9 is GRANTED pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and This Action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled admiralty action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On December 15, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days, and any reply was to be filed within ten days after the filing of objections. Plaintiff filed timely objections, and defendant filed a timely reply. /// /// /// 1 v. CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, Defendant. / GARY S. GRAY, Plaintiff, ORDER No. 2:08-cv-00433-MCE-DAD PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 15, 2008, are adopted in full; 2. Defendant's November 4, 2008 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 9) is granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); and 3. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: January 9, 2009 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?