Johnson v. Sacramento Motorcycle Dismantling, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER re 15 pltf's request for dismissal of Sacramento Motorcyle Dismantling, Inc., signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/26/09. Dft Sacramento Motorcycle Dismantling, Inc is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S 08-cv-00464-MCE-KJM PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF SACRAMENTO MOTORCYCLE DISMANTLING, INC. AND Proposed ORDER SCOTT N. JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. Sacramento Motorcycle Dismantling, Inc., et al, Complaint Filed: FEBRUARY 28, 2008 CASE TO BE REMAINED OPEN WITH REMAINING DEFENDANTS Defendants IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED by Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, that Defendant (Sacramento Motorcycle Dismantling, Inc.) be and is hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to be remained open with remaining Defendants. Defendant (Sacramento Motorcycle Dismantling, Inc.) is dismissed because this Defendant is no longer a proper party. /// /// /// 1 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-08-00464-MCE-KJM PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 23, 2009 /s/Scott N. Johnson____________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2009 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-08-00464-MCE-KJM PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?