Atherton v. US District Court, et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/14/09 DENYING 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. (Gaydosh, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MIKE KNOWLES, Warden, Respondent. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appointment counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings. Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's April 3, 2009, motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. DATED: April 14, 2009. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM MAY ATHERTON, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-0555 GEB EFB P
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?