Ortega v. Reyes, et al.,

Filing 122

SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 01/04/12 ordering defendants' motion to exclude witnesses not previously disclosed 78 is denied. Defendants' motion to exclude reference to any source of possib le judgment 79 is granted. Defendants' motion to bifurcate damages 88 is granted. Defendants motion to preclude Lonzell Green from testifying about matters unrelated to plaintiff's case and his opinions regarding custodial staff 89 is granted. Plaintiff's 12/13/11 motion to exclude reference to (a) plaintiff's conviction offense or (b) any specifics of plaintiff's mental health 114 at (10-11) is held in abeyance. On 02/10/12 at 10:00 a.m. the court will hold a final trial confirmation hearing via teleconference. (See order for further details) (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LAZARUS ORTEGA, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAMSON, et al., SUPPLEMENTAL Defendants. 14 15 No. CIV S-08-0588 CKD P PRETRIAL ORDER / Following a January 4, 2012 trial confirmation hearing at which plaintiff appeared 16 telephonically on his own behalf and attorney Kathleen J. Williams appeared telephonically on 17 defendants’ behalf, the court supplements its December 20, 2011 pretrial order with the 18 following findings and orders: 19 MOTIONS IN LIMINE 20 1. Defendants’ August 29, 2011 motion to exclude witnesses not previously 21 disclosed (Dkt. No. 78) is denied. As defendants did not disclose this potential witness until after 22 the close of discovery, plaintiff may call as a witness Officer Lloyd Wallace, CSP-Sacramento, 23 pursuant to the subpoena procedures set forth in the Discovery and Scheduling Order issued 24 September 22, 2010. 25 26 2. Defendants’ August 29, 2011 motion to exclude reference to any source of possible judgment (Dkt. No. 79) is granted. 1 1 2 3. Defendants’ October 17, 2011 motion to bifurcate punitive damages (Dkt. No. 88) is granted.1 3 4. Defendant’s October 17, 2011 motion to preclude Lonzell Green from 4 testifying about matters unrelated to plaintiff’s case and his opinions regarding custodial staff 5 (Dkt. No. 89) is granted. 6 5. Plaintiff’s December 13, 2011 motion to exclude reference to (a) plaintiff’s 7 conviction offense or (b) any specifics of plaintiff’s mental health (Dkt. No. 114 at 10-11), is 8 held in abeyance. As to part (a), plaintiff may renew his motion to exclude reference to his 9 conviction offense at trial if circumstances so warrant.2 As to part (b), the court will address 10 which if any mental health records may be admitted at the February 10, 2012 final trial 11 confirmation hearing, following the parties’ exchange and submission of medical and/or mental 12 health records they wish to introduce at trial. 13 PRETRIAL DEADLINES 14 1. Defendants’ counsel will promptly send plaintiff a replacement set of the 15 medical and mental health records produced earlier in discovery, as plaintiff asserts that officials 16 at High Desert State Prison confiscated these records and they are no longer in his possession. 17 2. On or before January 24, 2012, the parties shall both exchange and file with the 18 court Bates-stamped copies of those medical and mental health records they intend to introduce 19 at trial. 20 21 3. On or before February 3, 2012, pursuant to the pretrial order (Dkt. No. 116 at 6), the parties shall file any objections to proposed exhibits. Defendants shall also file a brief 22 1 23 24 25 26 Defendants’ counsel has also requested that liability and damages be bifurcated, on the theory that certain medical and mental health records are relevant only to damages. The court will take up this issue at the February 10, 2012 final trial confirmation hearing when it rules on the admissibility of specified mental health records. 2 Defendants’ counsel indicated at the January 4, 2012 trial confirmation hearing that she did not intend to raise the issue of plaintiff’s conviction offense unless plaintiff “opened the door” to this issue. 2 1 addressing why the medical and mental health records they seek to introduce should not be 2 excluded pursuant to plaintiff’s pending motion in limine. The parties may also submit any 3 stipulations and/or proposed voir dire questions by this date. 4 3. On February 10, 2012 at 10:00 a.m, the court will hold a final trial 5 confirmation hearing via teleconference to address plaintiff’s pending motion in limine 6 concerning the admission of mental health records, along with any pending objections to 7 exhibits. The court will also issue a final set of jury instructions. 8 TRIAL PROCEDURES 9 1. Trial is expected to last no more than four days, including any bifurcated trial 10 on the issue of punitive damages. The punitive damages phase of trial will proceed immediately 11 following any determination of liability. 12 2. Eight jurors will be selected. 13 3. After the court’s voir dire, the court may permit brief voir dire by plaintiff and 14 defense counsel, but the court reserves the right to limit the length of such questioning. 15 4. Challenges for cause will be made in writing. 16 5. Each side will have three peremptory challenges, to be made verbally. A pass 17 will be treated as a challenge. 18 19 6. Evidence is to be pre-marked before commencement of each session of the trial. 20 21 7. Speaking objections and side bars will not be allowed. If necessary, the parties may make a record while the jury is on break. 22 8. Unless there is a stipulation, counsel must move exhibits into evidence before 23 attempting to publish them to the jury.3 24 \\\\\ 25 3 26 At the January 4, 2012 hearing, the parties stipulated that Bates-stamped copies of medical and mental health records may be introduced into evidence rather than the originals. 3 1 9. The questioning of witnesses and presentation of opening statements and 2 closing arguments will be done from counsel table. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: January 4, 2012 5 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 2 orte0588.pto_2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?