Davis v. Walker et al
Filing
212
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/17/2018 DISREGARDING 210 Motion for TRO. The clerk is DIRECTED to serve this order and a copy of 210 Motion for TRO on counsel for plaintiff's guardian ad litem, Donald Lancaster. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KENNARD LEE DAVIS,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES WALKER, et al,
15
Defendants.
16
17
No. 2:10-cv-2139-KJM-DB
KENNARD LEE DAVIS,
20
21
ORDER
Plaintiff,
18
19
No. 2:08-cv-00593-KJM-DB
v.
JAMES WALKER et al,
Defendants.
22
23
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action under
24
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has been deemed incompetent by the court and has been appointed a
25
guardian ad litem. Case No. 2:08-cv-00593, ECF Nos. 28, 40, 184. The court has also appointed
26
counsel for his guardian ad litem, Donald Lancaster. Id., ECF No. 187. Due to the fact that Mr.
27
Brown is represented by a guardian ad litem with counsel, the court has issued an order stating it
28
will disregard pro se filings by plaintiff. Id., ECF No. 186.
1
1
On December 13, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order in
2
two of the cases pending before this court. Case no. 2:08-cv-00593, ECF No. 210; Case no. 2:10-
3
cv-02139, ECF No. 281. Because these filings were pro se, the court disregards them.
4
To ensure that any emergency needs of Mr. Davis do not go unnoticed, the clerk is
5
hereby DIRECTED to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining
6
order (ECF No. 210) on counsel for plaintiff’s guardian ad litem, Donald Lancaster at the address
7
below.
8
The Lancaster Law Group, A Professional Corporation
1101 Marina Village Parkway
Suite 201
Alameda, CA 94501
510-330-4592
Email: dlancaster@thelancasterlawgroup.com
9
10
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 17, 2018.
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?