Davis v. Walker et al

Filing 316

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/10/23 DENYING 308 Motion for Reconsideration. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

Kennard Davis,

12
13
14

No. 2:08-cv-0593-KJM-DB
Plaintiff,

v.
James Walker, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Kennard Davis,

18
19
20
21

No. 2:10-cv-2139-KJM-DB
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
James Walker, et al.,
Defendants.

22
23

Plaintiff Kennard Davis requests reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s orders in the

24

cases above, which directed defendants to respond to plaintiff’s motion to be restored to

25

competency and to “propose a roadmap for going forward,” and the Magistrate Judge permitted

26

plaintiff to reply. See Order (June 30, 2023), Case No. 08-0593, ECF No. 305; Case

27

No. 10-2139, ECF No. 384; Mot. Recons., Case No. 08-0593, ECF No. 308; Case No. 10-2139,

28

ECF No. 384. Plaintiff does not explain the reasoning behind his request for reconsideration.
1

1

The court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s orders and perceives neither clear error nor any

2

decision contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); 29 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). The motions for

3

reconsideration are denied.

4
5
6
7
8

This order resolves ECF No. 308 in Case No. 08-0593, and ECF No. 384 in Case
No. 10-2139.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 10, 2023.

9

2