Davis v. Walker et al

Filing 93

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/14/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's motions (case no. 08cv593, ECF Nos. 90 , 91 ; case no. 10cv2139, ECF Nos. 146, 147) are STRICKEN. Plaintiff is cautioned that further violations of this courts orders will result in a recommendation that these actions be dismissed.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNARD DAVIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:08-0593 KJM CKD P v. JAMES WALKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 -----------------------------------------No. 2:10-2139 KJM CKD P KENNARD DAVIS, Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 21 JAMES WALKER, et al., ORDER Defendants. 22 23 24 Four motions in the above titled actions were improperly filed by the incompetent plaintiff 25 and violate this court’s July 7, 2016 order restricting plaintiff’s filings. 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions (case no. 08cv593, ECF 2 Nos. 90, 91; case no. 10cv2139, ECF Nos. 146, 147) are stricken. Plaintiff is cautioned that 3 further violations of this court’s orders will result in a recommendation that these actions be 4 dismissed. 5 Dated: July 14, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 4 davis0593.stk 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?