Edwards v. CSP Solano, et al.,

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 07/06/09 ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants California State Prison - Solano and Cervantes are DISMISSED from this action; the Clerk is directed to terminate them as defendants to this action; this action will proceed against defendatns Sisto, Signh, Peck, Ferguson and Clay only.(Streeter, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. CSP SOLANO, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On May 5, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 5, 2009, are adopted in full; 1 DAVID E. EDWARDS, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-08-0620-JAM-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and Clay only. 2. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim against defendants California State Prison - Solano and Cervantes for which relief can be granted; 3. Defendants California State Prison - Solano and Cervantes are dismissed from this action, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate them as defendants to this action; and 4. This action will proceed against defendants Sisto, Singh, Peck, Ferguson, DATED: July 6, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?