Grant v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate et al

Filing 39

PROPOSED ORDER re 11 Statement GRANTING PRELMINARY INJUNCTION (Stein, Jerry) Modified on 4/23/2008 (Dillon, M).

Download PDF
Grant v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate et al Doc. 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JERRY H. STEIN (State Bar No. 78309) LEVIN & STEIN 28494 Westinghouse Place, Suite 201 Valencia, California 91355 Telephone: (310) 207-4663 Facsimile: (310) 207-2803 Email: jstein@lscslaw.com KEN T. KUNIYUKI KUNIYUKI & CHANG Suite 2660, Pauahi Tower 1003 Bishop Street Honolulu, HI 96813-3429 Telephone: (808) 524-4111 Facsimile: (808) 521-2389 Email: ken@law-hawaii.com Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Claimants JOHN DOE and JANE DOE 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ERIC GRANT, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 O R D E R GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS/BERNICE ) PAUAHI BISHOP ESTATE; J. DOUGLAS ING, ) NAINOA THOMPSON, DIANE J. PLOTTS, ) ROBERT K.U. KIHUNE, and CORBETT A.K ) KALAMA, in their capacities as Trustees of the ) Kamehameha Schools/ Bernice Pauahi Bishop ) Estate; JOHN DOE; and JANE DOE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) JOHN DOE; and JANE DOE, ) ) Counter-Claimants ) ) v. ) ) KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS/BERNICE ) PAUAHI BISHOP ESTATE; J. DOUGLAS ING, ) NAINOA THOMPSON, DIANE J. PLOTTS, ) ROBERT K.U. KIHUNE, and CORBETT A.K ) KALAMA, in their capacities as Trustees of the ) Kamehameha Schools/ Bernice Pauahi Bishop ) Estate; and ERIC GRANT, ) ) Counter-Defendants ) ) CASE NO.:08-00672 FCD-KSM [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court having considered John and Jane Doe's (the "Does") Cross-claim for Temporary Restraining Order; Preliminary Injunction; and Permanent Injunction; and for Declaratory Relief; the Does' application for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause; and the accompanying memorandum of points and authorities in support of the application and declarations of Jane Doe and Ken T. Kuniyuki; the Opposition filed by cross- defendants Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; J. Douglas Ing, Nainoa Thompson, Diane J. Plotts, Robert K.U. Kihune, and Corbett A.K. Kalama (collectively the "Estate"), including the Declarations of Colleen Wong and David Schulmeister; the Reply Briefs filed by the Does and Eric Grant, including all supporting declarations; and the argument of counsel at the hearing on April 17, 2008, it appears to the Court that the case is a proper case for the granting of a preliminary injunction based upon the following: (1) It appears reasonably probable that the Does will be able to establish that personal jurisdiction exists over the Estate, and that subject matter exists over the Does' claims against the Estate; and (2) The Does' moving papers raise serious questions with respect to the merits, and the balance of hardships tips sharply in favor of the Does given the fact that they have demonstrated the possibility that they may be subject to harassment and/or physical injury if their identities are disclosed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pending completion of the trial in this matter the Estate their officers, agents, employees, attorneys and representatives are hereby enjoined and restrained from directly or indirectly disclosing the identities of the Does unless and until otherwise permitted by this Court in order to effectuate a writ of attachment or other order issued by this Court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Does are not required to post a bond as provided by Local Rule 65.1-151. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any pleading, exhibit or other document filed with the Court that refers to the actual identities of the Does be filed under seal in this matter. This Order is issued on April 17, 2008 at p.m. ____________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 O R D E R GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?