Hooper, et al., v. Hooper

Filing 104

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/7/2010 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs incurred herein. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH W. SCALIA A Professional Law Corporation Joseph W. Scalia, Esq. State Bar No. 072526 350 University Avenue, Suite 101 Sacramento, California 95825 Office: (916) 646-8100 Facsimile: (916) 646-8105 E-Mail: jwscalia@sbcglobal.net Anthony J. Poidmore, Esq. Law Offices of Anthony J. Poidmore A Professional Law Corporation State Bar No.: 51346 3001 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 130 Roseville, California 95661 Telephone: (916) 787-1290 Facsimile: (916) 787-1293 E-Mail: joblaw@poidmorelaw.com Spencer T. Malysiak, Esq. Law Offices of Spencer T. Malysiak State Bar No.: 84654 1180 Iron Point Road, Suite 145B Folsom, California 95630 Telephone: (916) 985-4400 Facsimile: (916) 985-0100 E-Mail: spencer@malysiaklaw.com Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS/COUNTER-DEFENDANTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA /// /// P L A I N T I F F S ' /D E F E N D A N T S ' STIPULATION RE: DISM I S S A L W I T H PREJUDICE Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 RITA T. HOOPER and LOUIS G. HOOPER AS TRUSTEES OF THE GORDON HOOPER REAL ESTATE, INC. EMPLOYEES' PENSION AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN; RITA T. HOOPER, individually; LOUIS G. HOOPER, individually; and GORDON HOOPER REAL ESTATE, INC., Plaintiffs, 5 v. 6 KENDRICK HOOPER, 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Counter-Defendants. 17 ___________________________________________/ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. RITA T. HOOPER and LOUIS G. HOOPER as Trustees of the Gordon Hooper Real Estate, Inc. Employees' Pension and Profit Sharing Plan; RITA T. HOOPER and LOUIS G. HOOPER as Trustees of the Hooper Family Trust Dated October 9, 1979, as Amended; RITA T. HOOPER, individually; LOUIS G. HOOPER, individually; and GORDON HOOPER REAL ESTATE, INC., Defendant. ___________________________________________/ KENDRICK HOOPER, Counter-Claimant, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:08-CV-00699-JAM-KJM PLAINTIFFS'/DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Honorable John A. Mendez Complaint filed: March 24, 2008 Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Rita T. Hooper and Louis G. Hooper as Trustees of the Gordon Hooper Real Estate, Inc. Employees' Pension and Profit Sharing Plan; Rita T. Hooper, Individually; Louis G. Hooper, Individually; and, Gordon Hooper Real Estate, Inc. (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant/Counter-Claimant Julie Ann Rackey, also known as Julie Ann Rackey Hooper, as successor in interest and successor trustee and beneficiary of the Kendrick E. Hooper Trust of 2009, U.D.T., dated March 18, 2009 ("the Hooper Trust") (collectively "Defendants"), having resolved and settled their disputes in the above captioned matter and pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure hereby stipulate and request the Court enter an order as follows: /// /// P L A I N T I F F S ' /D E F E N D A N T S ' STIPULATION RE: DISM I S S A L W I T H PREJUDICE Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, that the Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby dismiss the Complaint and Counter-Claim in the above captioned action with prejudice and each party to this stipulation for dismissal with prejudice shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs incurred herein. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: January 5, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH W. SCALIA, APC By: /s/ Joseph W. Scalia Joseph W. Scalia, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Dated: January 4, 2010 By: /s/ Glen C. Shea Glen C. Shea, Esq. Attorney for Defendants/Counter-Claimants IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 7, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez_______ Honorable John A. Mendez P L A I N T I F F S ' /D E F E N D A N T S ' STIPULATION RE: DISM I S S A L W I T H PREJUDICE Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?