Lillard v Starbucks Corporation

Filing 31

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/5/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff has not responded to the 30 October 27, 2009 Order, therefore this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge Dated: v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation doing business in California, Defendant. BERLIN LILLARD, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2:08-cv-719-GEB-EFB DISMISSAL ORDER

Plaintiff was warned in the Order filed October 27, 2009 that "failure to respond to the [October 27, 2009] order [by 4:00 p.m. on November 2, 2009] could be construed as Plaintiff's abandonment [o]f this case, and this case could be dismissed." Plaintiff has not

responded to the October 27, 2009 Order, therefore this action is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 5, 2009