Sedillo v. Makela et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by District Judge J. Michael Seabright on 1/6/09 GRANTING Pltf's 12 Application to proceed IFP. Pltf to pay $350 filing fee. Warden to collect monthly payments and forward to the court. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Mike McDonald, Warden HDSP. (cc: CDCR) (Engbretson, K.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDREW JOSEPH SEDILLO, ) CIVIL NO. 2:08-00782 JMS ) ) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR Plaintiff, ) LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA ) PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING vs. ) COLLECTION OF FILING FEE ) LINDA MAKELA, K.A. JOHNSON, ) MARTINEZ, and LISA ANN ) NOVAK, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________ ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING COLLECTION OF FILING FEE Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly,
Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). When, as
here, Plaintiff has insufficient funds available in his prison trust account, the court does not assess an initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is obligated,
however, to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust account. These payments shall be collected and forwarded by the
appropriate agency to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in Plaintiff's account exceeds $10.00, until the filing fee is paid in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a government entity or officer or employee of a government entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The
court has not yet screened the Complaint to determine whether it sufficiently states a claim and shall proceed in the normal course. After screening, if the court determines that
Plaintiff's Complaint states a claim, the court will issue a written Order and will then instruct the Clerk of Court to send Plaintiff the documents necessary to effect service. CONCLUSION 1. Plaintiff'S request for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing MIKE MCDONALD, the Warden at
fee of $350.00 for this action.
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON (HDSP), or his designee, shall collect from Plaintiff's prison account monthly payments in an amount equal to twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison account and shall forward those payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) until a total of $350.00 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk of Court. 2
THE PAYMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY THE NAME AND NUMBER ASSIGNED TO THIS ACTION. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of
this Order on Plaintiff and on MIKE MCDONALD, WARDEN, HDSP, P.O. BOX 750, SUSANVILLE, CA 96127-0750. 4. The court has not yet screened the Complaint to
determine whether it sufficiently states a claim and shall proceed in the normal course. After screening, if the court
determines that Plaintiff's Complaint states a claim, the court will issue a written Order and will then instruct the Clerk of Court to send Plaintiff the documents necessary to effect service. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 6, 2009.
/s/_J._Michael_Seabright_____ ___ __ _______ _________ J. Michael Seabright United States District Judge
Sedillo v. Makela et al., Civ. No. 2:08-00782 JMS, Order Granting Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Directing Collection of Filing Fee
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?