Marthell v. Tilton

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 07/31/09 ordering that any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are vacated. The clerk of the court reassign this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge. The parties shall please take note that all documents hereafter filed with the clerk of the court shall bear case number CIV S-08-798 EFB P. (cc: JAM)(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 KERRY MARTHELL, 14 Petitioner, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge." See 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)(5) and (c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 73v. JAMES E. TILTON Respondent. ORDER Civ. No. S-08-0798 JAM EFB P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the magistrate judge. //// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge. The parties shall please take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number Civ. S08-798 EFB P Dated: July 31, 2009 /s/John A. Mendez HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Judge Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. Dated: July 31, 2009 ______________________________ HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?