Bejaran v. California Department of Correction Rehab, et al.

Filing 63

ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 7/16/10 ORDERING pltf's Motion to Appoint Counsel 61 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)

(PC) Bejaran v. Lueth et al.

Doc. 63

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JESSE E. BEJARAN, #F-81663, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BRIAN K. LUETH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) CIV. NO. 2:08-000817 DAE

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL On July 9, 2010, Plaintiff Jesse Bejaran filed the instant Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Doc. # 61.) Upon review of the record, it appears that this is Plaintiff's ninth request for appointment of counsel. In the Court's most recent order on this matter, dated April 12, 2010, the Court found that Plaintiff largely reiterated the same arguments and did not present exceptional circumstances requiring the appointment of counsel. (Doc. # 52.) Plaintiff's current motion is nearly identical to the motion already ruled upon and denied by this Court. Because Plaintiff's request does not add any new meaningful information and fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances that warrant appointment of counsel, Plaintiff's ninth request is DENIED for the

Dockets.Justia.com

reasons set forth in this Court's prior orders. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989); Doc. # 6 at 12. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, July 16, 2010.

_____________________________ David Alan Ezra United States District Judge

Bejaran v. Lueth, et al., No. CIV. 2:08-00817 DAE; ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

2