Butler v. Wolcott et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Robert H. Whaley on 06/23/10 ORDERING that dft's 29 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; dfts shall file their reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment by 06/24/10. (Benson, A.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Before the Court is Defendants' Request for an Extension of Time to File 13 Reply (Ct. Rec. 29). The motion was heard without oral argument and on an 14 expedited basis. 15 Defendants ask the Court to extend the deadline to file their Reply to 16 Plaintiff's Opposition to their Motion for Summary Judgment by two days. The 17 Court finds that good cause exists to grant the motion. 18 19 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY ~ 1 s/Robert H. Whaley ROBERT H. WHALEY United States District Judge
C : \ W I N D O W S \ T e m p \n o t e s 1 0 1 A A 1 \ g r a n t e x t . w p d

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCELLUS BUTLER, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, L. WOLCOTT, B. WEBSTER, Defendants. NO. CV-08-0857-RHW ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Request for an Extension of Time to File Reply (Ct. Rec. 2. On or before June 24, 2010, Defendants shall file their Reply. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter DATED this 23rd day of June, 2010.

20 29) is GRANTED.

23 this Order and forward copies to Plaintiff and counsel.