Rognirhar v. Grannis, et al

Filing 28

ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve * amended complaint * filed on * 5/11/2012,* on * D. Foston, D. Van Leer*, signed by District Judge Lonny R. Suko on 2/11/2013. Plaintiff's 25 Preliminary Motion To Compel Agents of Defendants to Comply With California Code of Regulations, or, in the alternative, Motion For Preliminary Injunction Enjoining Agents of Defendant Further Impeding Plaintiff's Access To The Court is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

STRIDER ROGNIRHAR,

No. CV-08-892-LRS

vs.

13
14

ORDER AND ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE
N. GRANNIS, et al .

15

BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL
/

WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS

16

Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. By order

17

filed August 24, 2012, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint states a cognizable claim

18

for relief against defendants Foston and Van Leer and ordered plaintiff to provide information

19

for service of process on form USM-285, a completed summons, sufficient copies of the

20

complaint for service, and a notice of compliance. Plaintiff has filed the required papers.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward the instructions for service of

23

process, the completed summons, copies of the complaint, and copies of this order to the United

24

States Marshal.

25
26

2. Within ten days from the date of this order, the United States Marshal is
directed to notify defendants Defendants Foston and Van Leer of the commencement of this
1

1

action and to request a waiver of service of summons in accordance with the provisions of Fed.

2

R. Civ. P. 4(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c).

3
4
5
6
7
8

3. The United States Marshal is directed to retain the sealed summons and a copy
of the complaint in their file for future use.
4. The United States Marshal shall file returned waivers of service of summons as
well as any requests for waivers that are returned as undelivered as soon as they are received.
5. If a waiver of service of summons is not returned by a defendant within sixty
days from the date of mailing the request for waiver, the United States Marshal shall:

9

a. Personally serve process and a copy of this order upon the defendant

10

pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C.

11

§ 566(c) and shall command all necessary assistance from the California

12

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDC) to execute this order.

13

The United States Marshal shall maintain the confidentiality of all

14

information provided by the CDC pursuant to this order.

15

b. Within ten days after personal service is effected, the United States

16

Marshal shall file the return of service for the defendant, along with

17

evidence of any attempts to secure a waiver of service of summons and of

18

the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on said defendant.

19

Said costs shall be enumerated on the USM-285 form and shall include the

20

costs incurred by the Marshal’s office for photocopying additional copies

21

of the summons and complaint and for preparing new USM-285 forms, if

22

required. Costs of service will be taxed against the personally served

23

defendant in accordance with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2).

24
25
26

6. Defendants shall reply to the complaint within the time provided by the
applicable provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a).
7. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary
2

1

judgment, motions concerning discovery, motions pursuant to Rules 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 55, 56, 59

2

and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and motions pursuant to Local Rule 11-110 shall

3

be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(m). Failure to oppose such a motion timely may be

4

deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. Opposition to all other motions need be filed only

5

as directed by the court.

6

8. If plaintiff is released from prison at any time during the pendency of this case,

7

any party may request application of other provisions of Local Rule 78-230 in lieu of Local Rule

8

78-230(m). In the absence of a court order granting such a request, the provisions of Local Rule

9

78-230(m) will govern all motions described in #7 above regardless of plaintiff’s custodial status.

10
11

See Local Rule 1-102(d).
9. Pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003),

12

plaintiff is advised of the following requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss for failure to

13

exhaust administrative remedies made by defendant pursuant to non-enumerated Rule 12(b) of

14

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a motion is a request for dismissal of unexhausted

15

claims without prejudice. The defendant may submit affidavits or declarations under penalty of

16

perjury and admissible documentation to support the motion to dismiss. To oppose the motion,

17

plaintiff may likewise file declarations under penalty of perjury and admissible documentation.

18

Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint if the

19

complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and plaintiff calls to

20

the court’s attention those parts of the complaint upon which plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may serve

21

and file one or more affidavits or declarations by other persons who have personal knowledge of

22

relevant matters. Plaintiff may also rely upon written records, but plaintiff must prove that the

23

records are what plaintiff claims they are. If plaintiff fails to contradict defendant’s evidence

24

with admissible evidence, the court may rely on the defendant’s evidence. In the event both sides

25

submit matters outside the pleadings, the court may look beyond the pleadings and decide

26

disputed issues of fact. If plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion, the
3

1

court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s motion. If the

2

defendant’s motion to dismiss, whether opposed or unopposed, is granted, plaintiff’s

3

unexhausted claims will be dismissed without prejudice.

4

10. Pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc),

5

cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1035 (1999), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988),

6

plaintiff is advised of the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment

7

made by defendants pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a motion

8

is a request for an order for judgment in favor of defendants without trial. A defendant’s motion

9

for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendants contend are not reasonably

10

subject to dispute and that entitle the defendants to judgment. To oppose a motion for summary

11

judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of

12

the following ways. Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the

13

complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and

14

plaintiff calls to the court’s attention those parts of the complaint upon which plaintiff relies.

15

Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that

16

plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must

17

have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely upon written records, but plaintiff

18

must prove that the records are what plaintiff claims they are. Plaintiff may rely upon all or any

19

part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions

20

obtained in this proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendants’ evidence with

21

counteraffidavits or other admissible evidence, the defendants’ evidence may be taken as the

22

truth and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment granted. If there is some good reason

23

why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required to oppose a motion for summary

24

judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone considering the defendants’ motion. If

25

plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion or a request to postpone

26

consideration of the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to
4

1

the defendants’ motion. If the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, whether opposed or

2

unopposed, is granted, judgment will be entered for the defendants without a trial and the case

3

will be closed.

4
5

11. A motion or opposition supported by unsigned affidavits or declarations will
be stricken.

6

12. Each party shall keep the court informed of a current address at all times

7

while the action is pending. Any change of address must be reported promptly to the court in a

8

separate document captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of Change of Address.” A notice

9

of change of address must be properly served on other parties. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f),

10

service of documents at the record address of a party is fully effective. Failure to inform the

11

court of a change of address may result in the imposition of sanctions including dismissal of the

12

action.

13
14
15

13. The Clerk of the Court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of
Court.
14. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil

16

Procedure, or the Local Rules of Court may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but

17

not limited to, dismissal of the action or entry of default. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Local Rule 11-110.

18

15. Plaintiff’s Preliminary Motion To Compel Agents of Defendants to Comply

19

With California Code of Regulations, or, in the alternative, Motion For Preliminary Injunction

20

Enjoining Agents of Defendant Further Impeding Plaintiff’s Access To The Court, ECF No. 25,

21

filed September 24, 2012 is DENIED for failure to include a certificate of service and to comply

22

with the Local Rules of the Court.

23

DATED: February 11, 2013.

24

s/Lonny R. Suko

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
5